3/28/2012 · Neutral citation: Ersumo v Minister of Home Affairs (69/2012) [2012] ZASCA 31 (28 March 2012) Coram: MTHIYANE DP, NUGENT, MAJIEDT and WALLIS JJA and NDITA AJA. Heard: 27 March 2012 . Delivered: 28 March 2012.
Neutral Citation: Ersumo v Minister of Home Affairs (69/12) [2012] ZASCA 31 (28 March 2012) Case No: 69/11. Media Summary . New Foodcorp Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries (82/11) [2012] ZASCA 30 (28 March 2012), Ersumo v Minister of Home Affairs . The SCA today upheld an appeal by an Ethiopian citizen who arrived in South Africa at the end of May and is at present detained in the Lindela facility outside Krugersdorp. It held that, although Mr Ersumo may have been in South Africa illegally at the time of his arrest and detention, once he indicated to the …
Minister of Home Affairs v Scalabrini Centre, Cape Town (735/12 & 360/13) 27 September 2013 | Judicial Body: South Africa: Supreme Court of Appeal | Countries: South Africa. Ersumo v Minister of Home Affairs, 6/1/2018 · Satchwell J held that in the cases of Bula and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Others 2012 (4) SA 560 (SCA) and Ersumo v Minister of Home Affairs and Others 2012 (4) SA 581 (SCA) the SCA made it clear that the factual basis justifying and entitling resort to the provisions of the Refugees Act 130 of 1998 (the Act) had to be placed before …
Bula and Others v Minister of Home Affairs (2011) ZASCA 209. The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Bula and others were entitled to their release from custody and protection against deportation because they had indicated a desire to make an application for refugee status. Ersumo v Minister of Home Affairs (69/2012) (2012) ZASCA 31, Refworld is the leading source of information necessary for taking quality decisions on refugee status. Refworld contains a vast collection of reports relating to situations in countries of origin, policy documents and positions, and documents relating to international and national legal frameworks. The information has been carefully selected and compiled from UNHCR’s global network of field …
[11] In Ruta v Minister of Home Affairs , the CC affirmed the overarching importance of section 2 and stated as follows: [24] This is a remarkable provision. Perhaps it is unprecedented in the history of our country’s enactments.
In Ersumo supra the court placed special reliance upon a phrase in Abdi and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others 2011 (3) SA 37 (SCA) to the effect that “intending applicants for refugee status are given every reasonable opportunity to file an application with the relevant refugee reception office” [10]. [my underlining].
Flynote: Judgement – Application for release from detention – Decision later overturned by the SCA in Ersumo v The Minister of Home Affairs and others. Tsebe and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others, Phale v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (27682/10, 51010/10) [2011] ZAGPJHC 115; 2012 (1) BCLR 77 (GSJ); [2012] 1 All SA 83 (GSJ) (22 …
